![]() ![]() Since then, ProPublica also revealed that Alito had taken a luxury vacation in Alaska with a Republican donor who had business interests before the court. But the Supreme Court’s unique status - it’s the only federal court created by the Constitution - puts it outside the reach of those standards that apply to other federal jurists.ĭemocrats first sought to address that after ProPublica reported earlier this year that Justice Clarence Thomas participated in lavish vacations and a real estate deal with a top Republican donor - and after Chief Justice John Roberts declined to testify before the committee about the ethics of the court. Democrats last week pushed Supreme Court ethics legislation through a Senate committee, though the bill’s prospects in the full Senate are dim.Īll federal judges other than the justices already adhere to an ethics code that was developed by the federal judiciary. ![]() The practical effect of the decision in North Carolina is minimal in that the North Carolina Supreme Court, under a new Republican majority, already has undone its redistricting ruling.įollow the AP's coverage of the U.S. The high court did, though, suggest there could be limits on state court efforts to police elections for Congress and president. But federal courts must not abandon their own duty to exercise judicial review.” The justices by a 6-3 vote upheld a decision by North Carolina’s top court that struck down a congressional districting plan as excessively partisan under state law.Ĭhief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, stating that “state courts retain the authority to apply state constitutional restraints when legislatures act under the power conferred upon them by the Elections Clause. Instead, they sent the case back to lower courts for further review based on their decision.Įarlier this week, on Tuesday, the justices ruled that state courts can act as a check on their legislatures in redistricting and other issues affecting federal elections, rejecting arguments by North Carolina Republicans that could have transformed contests for Congress and president. The justices didn't say whether the mail carrier should win his case, however. Her opponents, meanwhile, say that if she wins, a range of businesses will be able to discriminate, refusing to serve Black, Jewish or Muslim customers, interracial or interfaith couples or immigrants. She says ruling against her would force artists - from painters and photographers to writers and musicians - to do work that is against their beliefs. State law requires businesses that are open to the public to provide services to all customers, but the designer, Lorie Smith, says the law violates her free speech rights. The case involves a Christian graphic artist from Colorado who wants to begin designing wedding websites but objects to making wedding websites for same-sex couples. Regardless of what happens at the high court, loan payments that have been on hold since the start of the coronavirus pandemic three years ago will resume this summer.Ī clash of gay rights and religious rights is also still to be decided by the court. The administration has said millions of borrowers would benefit from the program. He also wanted to cancel an additional $10,000 for those who received federal Pell Grants to attend college. ![]() ![]() Biden had proposed erasing $10,000 in federal student loan debt for those with incomes below $125,000 a year, or households that earn less than $250,000. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |